ETF Prime Archive

Check out our archive of podcasts

New Actively-Managed ETF

AdvisorShares recently launched its first ETF product, the actively-managed DENT Tactical ETF (NYSE:  DENT).  This “ETF of ETFs” uses Harry Dent’s relative strength models to specify entries and exits.  Dent’s analysis is rooted in the Dent Method – an approach which uses changes in demographics to forecast future economic trends. AdvisorShares states that the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective of long-term capital growth “by identifying, through proprietary economic and demographic analysis, the overall trend of the U.S. and global economies and how consumer spending patterns may change based on this analysis.  Then, the portfolio manager implements an investment strategy using ETFs across several asset classes such as domestic and foreign equities, domestic or foreign fixed income or commodities”.

Actively-managed ETFs do not attempt to track an index like most other ETFs but instead, attempt to generate excess returns based on individual manager performance.  While the passive versus active management debate rages on, there is certainly no lack of demand for actively-managed products.  And by using the ETF structure, active managers can reduce the operational costs of managing the fund, thereby providing lower costs to investors when compared to actively-managed mutual funds.  In addition, these ETFs can offer greater tax efficiency and easier accessibility than mutual funds (a number of which are only offered through certain brokers whereas ETFs can be bought and sold through just about any broker).

One potential downside to actively-managed ETFs is that the transparency they provide (holdings must be reported daily) could minimize any advantage that the fund manager believes they have.  Outside investors can track the moves of the fund, potentially front-running entries and exits.  However, many in the industry aren’t overly concerned that this will have a meaningful impact on the performance of actively-managed ETFs and could be perceived as an advantage in an environment where investors are demanding greater transparency.

AdvisorShares has also filed preliminary prospectuses to launch two additional actively-managed ETFs – the WCM/BNY Mellon Focused Growth ADR ETF and Legacy Long/Short ETF.

UNG Announces It Will Issue New Shares

As commodity ETFs have grown in popularity and have been heavily scrutinized by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), many commodity-tracking ETFs stopped issuing new shares in fear that position limits would soon be imposed. 

One of the first to do so, despite having approval from the SEC to issue new shares, was the United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG).  As a result and with continued investor demand, this ETF was trading at more than a 16% premium from the value of its underlying index.  However, most recently UNG has announced that it will go against what it previously said and will issue new shares starting September 28.

In a recent filing with the SEC, UNG said it would resume offerings of creation baskets in blocks of 100,000 units.  This announcement came after the CME announced that it will enforce existing position limits on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade and the COMEX division of NYMEX.   

This could potentially benefit UNG in that it is possible that the resumption of creation activity by the fund could reduce or remove any premium over NAV that is currently present.  From an investor’s perspective, it could be good news for those who want to gain easy exposure to natural gas without paying a hefty premium.  For those who paid a substanital premium for shares of UNG and held onto them, the announcement could be detrimental.

Me and My Renminbi

One ingredient, one very, very big ingredient, has been lacking in the menu of emerging market currency plays: the dollar de-coupling of the only true 800 pound gorilla of emerging market central banks.

At long last, though, that may be changing. The Financial Times reports that later this month China will, for the first time, sell renminbi-denominated bonds to offshore investors.

While the size of the sale is rather modest at Rmb 6 billion (approx. $879 million), it represents an important first step in the integration of China’s sovereign debt and currency with global capital markets – characterized as a move to “improve the international status” of the renminbi.

FT reported that the Chinese government has taken several steps to promote the use of the renminbi in settlement of trade with China. But a viable presence in international sovereign debt markets is also regarded as critical to providing foreign investors the means by which to hold renminbi-denominated Chinese debt.

Globally, once recovery-related demand kicks in and government stimulus spending tabs come up for payment, inflation and very lumpy government debt issuance and money-printing appetites are likely to emerge – on a scale without historical precedent – particularly in developed markets such as the U.S.

That environment will have risk managers and investors leaning heavily on physical assets and currencies to manage risk and to benefit from massive macro trends. Emerging market currencies, given the far more robust growth rates likely to be experienced by emerging economies, are poised to play an increasingly important role.

Given the aggressive historical pegging of the renminbi to the dollar, it’s not surprising that neither product market nor investors have yet rushed to stake out positions in the currency. In fact, at present there are only two renminbi currency Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs – an exchange traded fund, or ETF, and an exchange-traded note, or ETN).

For emerging market currencies that are able to float more freely there’s already an abundance of choices – covering individual currencies of Brazil, India, Russia, Mexico and South Africa as well as emerging markets currency baskets that also include Turkey, Poland, Chile, Taiwan, South Korea and Israel.

And now the stage is set – at least for the first Act – in what promises to be an important rise to prominence of the renminbi and, for investors, the evolution of an asset segment that may prove to be quite important down the road. Keep your ear to the ground on related news and keep your eye on CYB and CNY for evidence of a more dynamic renminbi /  dollar performance than what we’ve seen in the longstanding pegged currency regime – it’ll take some time to really get rolling.

ETFs Continue to Take Market Share

The latest ICI fund data shows that ETFs continue to take market share from mutual funds.  As of the end of July, ETFs represented 8.6% of all non-money market funds.  In 2005, ETFs represented only 3.5%, notable because that’s the year non-money market mutual funds reached their peak in terms of total number of funds.  Since that time, the number of mutual funds has decreased by 466 and assets in mutual funds have decreased from a peak of $8.9 trillion in 2007 to $6.8 trillion currently. 

While it’s easy to point to the recent market collapse as a primary culprit in the decrease of mutual fund assets, one only has to look to ETF assets to see what’s really driving the decline of mutual funds – investors are realizing the potential benefits that ETFs can offer including lower costs, more transparency, tax efficiency, and better, more direct access to alternative asset classes.  While mutual fund assets have decreased, ETF assets have increased from $608 billion in 2007 to $640 billion currently.

ETFs still have some ground to cover (and it’s important to note that ETFs haven’t even begun to significantly penetrate the 401k space – the key driver for mutual fund assets), but the growth trend is too obvious to ignore.  If you haven’t explored the potential benefits of ETFs, now may be the time to do so.  There’s a reason investors are moving into ETFs and out of mutual funds.

Where There’s Smoke, There’s Usually Fire

Most investors recall the pain they suffered during the most recent market meltdown as a pelting by multiple, highly correlated collapses in asset values packed into the fall of 2008.

The reality, however, is that performance breakdowns got underway back in May of 2007 and cascaded over the next sixteen months across all non-treasury, non-agency asset classes.  There was smoke, and lots of it, well before October 2008.

So where was smoke to be found?  In the breakdown of long-term price trends.  Price crossovers relative to the long-term 200-day moving average can provide important insights regarding a changing risk environment.  People often say that a picture is worth a thousand words.  

Here’s just such a picture, illustrating how clearly trend-oriented performance can be for a major asset class.  Note the price crossover relative to the 200-day moving average in late 2007.

smoke3 

So,what’s the lesson to be learned?  Know where you are relative to long-term price trends.  Whatever analysis and investment strategy one might employ, all investors ought to regularly cast an eye on long-term price trends for signs of smoke, as such warnings nearly always precede the appearance of fire.

Skip to content