Welcome to the ETF Prime Podcast
One of the “most helpful plain-English resources for investors who want to demystify exchange-traded funds” – Bloomberg Businessweek
Latest Episode
Rethinking Sector ETFs & Baron Capital’s ETF Debut
Michael Cohick, Director of Product Management at VanEck, breaks down the firm’s lineup of TruSector ETFs and how they aim to address tracking error caused by regulatory diversification limits – constraints that can force traditional sector funds to underweight the largest companies in their benchmarks. Matt Camuso, Head of ETF Solutions at Baron Capital, discusses the firm’s recent entry into the ETF space and outlines its distinctive approach to actively managed growth equity investing, including the Baron First Principles ETF (RONB).
About the Podcast
ETF Prime is hosted by Nate Geraci. Learn how to make ETFs a part of your investment portfolio as Nate spotlights individual ETFs and interviews experts from across the country. ETF Prime is available on Apple Podcasts, Android, Spotify, and most other major podcasting platforms. Specific guest interviews can be accessed by visiting the ETF Expert Corner.
Recent Episodes
Year-End Financial Planning Tips
Nate & Jason discuss key items to tackle before year-end to keep your investments and finances on track. Sean O’Hara, Director of Pacer Financial, spotlights the Pacer lineup of ETFs including the Trendpilot 750 ETF (PTLC).
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Alpha Architect’s Jack Vogel on New Book “DIY Financial Advisor”
Alpha Architect’s Jack Vogel, one of the authors of “DIY Financial Advisor“, discusses key investor takeaways from his new book including why you should be wary of “investment experts”. Nate & Jason also spotlight the ValueShares International Quantitative Value ETF (ticker IVAL).
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Vanguard’s Ed Saracino Discusses Bond Market, Bond ETFs
Ed Saracino, Senior Investment Analyst at Vanguard, discusses navigating bonds in today’s challenging environment and also spotlights several Vanguard bond ETFs. Nate & Conor explain the differences between investing in individual bonds, bond mutual funds, and bond ETFs.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
3 Steps for Better Retirement Saving and Investing Habits
The following was authored by Nelli Oster, PhD, Director and Investment Strategist at BlackRock
Consider the following choices:
1. You are offered a snack to eat now—would you prefer a chocolate bar or an orange?
2. You are offered a snack now to eat next week—would you prefer a chocolate bar or an orange?
This example highlights one of the main behavioral challenges in saving for retirement. Unfortunately, not enough people ask themselves the question of “how much money do I need to retire?” This uncertainty can cause financial worries. As humans, not only do we tend to overweight our experiences today at the expense of those in our future, veering towards instant gratification, but we also change our preferences over time. This same mindset is what leads to things like mis sold pension happening because people rush into schemes they think will get them more money before looking into it more. In effect, we make choices today that our future selves would prefer not to be making, whether it’s to eat healthier or quit smoking. This is known as the present bias. In today’s post, I’ll take a look at this phenomenon—and several others—that investors often face when saving and investing for retirement. If you’re looking to sell your home in your retirement, take a look at how a land contract could help you to save.
Common Saving and Investing Behavioral Derailers
In addition to present bias, behavioral mistakes in saving and investing for retirement include:
1. A lack of discipline to take the actions we know would be right for the longer term.
2. Procrastination and a preference for the current state of affairs, also known as the status quo bias. This can arise for a variety of rational and behavioral reasons including lack of motivation, greater sensitivity to losses than gains (loss aversion), and the fear of potentially making a wrong decision.
3. Rules of thumb such as anchoring, an over-reliance on the first piece of information offered, and naïve diversification rules.
4. Overconfidence and other biases that have been found to plague individual investors’ portfolios in general.
Financial Implications of Behavioral Biases
The below behavioral biases can meaningfully impact the ability to meet one’s financial retirement goals:
Procrastination and the Status Quo Bias
These can delay or prevent people from signing up for retirement plans, even when tax advantageous and with added incentives such as company matching contributions. In an extreme example, a study found that in a sample of 25 defined benefit plans in the United Kingdom that were fully paid for by the employer, only about half of the eligible employees signed up. Further, the greater the number of funds offered by the plan, the lower the participation rate, presumably thanks to the added complexity of the decision problem.
Anchoring
This can cause retirement plan participants to stick to the generally low default contribution rates, perhaps believing them to be an implicit plan recommendation. Other naïve rules of thumb, such as contributing just enough to maximize company matching contributions or simply picking the maximum allowed rate, are also blind to an individual’s true funding needs. As for asset allocation, people sometimes use diversification strategies such as dividing their savings equally across funds, or some other arithmetically simple rule. If plan participants are offered a large enough number of funds to cause a choice overload, they may simply give up and just go with the safest fund in the menu.
Overconfidence
This and other types of biases that plague individual investors’ portfolios in general, which can lead to a heavy concentration in the employer’s stock and under-diversification, and poor stock market timing, have also been discovered in retirement portfolios.
The obvious risk of these poor saving and investing behaviors is insufficient income at retirement. Research shows that the average working US household has virtually no retirement savings, and even when considering not just retirement assets, but total net worth, around 65 percent of households fall short of conservative retirement savings targets for their age and income.
How to Mitigate the Impact of Biases
While financial education by itself hasn’t been found to be very successful in tackling behavioral biases, there are three steps investors can take to improve their retirement savings behavior:
Tackle procrastination
Address the inherent complexity in saving for retirement by breaking tasks into less intimidating components, getting financial advice in the process if needed. Set explicit rewards for completing individual tasks.
Frame the problem differently
Focus in as much detail as possible on the happier retirement that can result from saving and investing today, rather than the immediate monetary loss from saving. The more vivid the picture of a happy retirement, the more powerful this method is likely to be in changing behaviors.
Use software tools
Creating realistic depictions of aged versions of yourself can help bridge the gap between how much you care about yourself today vs. in the future.
This is where, as an investor, knowing yourself is especially valuable. You can read more about that in A First Step to Investing Success: Know Thyself.
Nelli Oster, PhD, is a Director and Investment Strategist at BlackRock. You can read more of her posts here.
This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of November 2015 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader.
©2015 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. iSHARES and BLACKROCK are registered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.
iS-16989
We Answer Your ETF Questions
We answer your ETF questions including on ‘ETFs of ETFs’ and low volatility ETFs. Neil Macneale, owner of the 2-for-1 Index which powers the USCF Stock Split ETF (TOFR), explains stock splits and why he believes investors can benefit from them.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download